TEXTE
Anja Wiese, 1996
Measuring, counting, trading, selling
– The market is a venue for transaction and interaction and what would it
be without the weighing scales as instrument for measuring quantities.
An arrangement of scales on the art market as a ground sculpture that
can be mounted reverses the role of the instrument into a marketable
commodity: just like rugs and carpets, it is sold by the square metre.
In her work for the art fair Kunstmesse Art Cologne, Ulrike Kessl turns
the tables: her installation titled “waagen” 1) is not only a
self-evident object d’art presented to the assessment and judgement of
the public. Viewers of the work rather become participants as soon as
they become physically aware of and responsive to the object they have
mounted. The work is not perceived from a distant perspective, but
rather does the viewer’s body become a central and essential object of
perception.
The personal weighing scales used for this work differ in their
contemporary form and colour, their design. As functional instruments
they are evidence of the collective stylistic preference of their time
and their individual utilisation in private households. Each item bears
witness to its distinct history and the people that used it in their
daily lives. More than any other domestic instrument, the weighing
scales represents a culture of body control. Its place is the bathroom,
its function the individualised monitoring of change in body weight.
What was originally an indispensable instrument of trading, the weighing
scales in this century came to be used by people to gauge and control
themselves. In the post-war period in Germany, it became an attribute of
economic growth, in the course of which moderation and proportion were
manifest in surplus and excess.
In “waagen” Ulrike Kessl renounces all personal signature.After the
initial creative inventiveness, her artistic activity involves a
collection and arrangement of existing objects. Just as the individual
weighing scales is a non-determing element of the installation, the
artist is an archaeologist withdrawn into her immediate individuality.
The sequential arrangement of the scales that – although different – all
perform the same function, i.e. weighing, contradicts the
anecdotal-narrative element that makes the visible functionality of
these used objects accessible. The neatly arranged variety of objects
decreases the significance of the individual element. Each individual
item is simply a replaceable part of the whole.
People using scales to monitor their physical development weigh
themselves by assigning a finite weight to their bodies as volume and
mass. They thus also reduce themselves to their material contents of
bone, organs and skin. Because weighing reduces all people to the lowest
common denominator, their body weight in kilograms and pounds, it also
underlines human equality in this very physical essence. Ulrike Kessl
does not make a theme of the body as medium and object of the senses,
but sees it in its essential materiality. This physical reductionism is
not surprising in an artist who for many years has been exploring modes
of representation for mass, weight and volume.
The fact that the visitor can mount the work “waagen” allows an
interactive relationship to develop between him and the installation
within the preordained framework of the game, with the state of the work
being changed by the presence of the visitors. The sculpture thus has
an active state and an inactive idle state. As participant in an
artistic measuring process on the arranged balancing scales, the visitor
experiences weighing as an elementary-mechanical interaction. The force
exerted by weight on the scales is reflected by the noisy swing of
their display indicators. But this trace left by our steps soon
vanishes, and the game we were allowed to play swings back to the
starting position.
Ulrike Kessl’s work “waagen” unfolds a dialectic of similarity versus
variety, of individuality versus uniformity, of freedom versus
determination. The individual play made possible by the visitor’s
participation in the work, the fun of weighing oneself and balanced
walking, is contrasted with measurement and weighing, reaction to
material presence. Weighing involves a distancing from oneself by
reducing the body to its mere weight, and just as all scales are the
same, all people are the same when on this instrument; by virtue of
their common materiality and weight they lose their individuality.
“Waagen” moreover contrasts the lesser significance of the every-day
household object used as installation material with the higher
significance of the scales as symbol of justice.
This work shows – and the truths that persist are always simple truths –
that all people have weight. It shows that we are of weight: In this
vital materiality we are all equal by having a body that weighs, grows
up and grows ill and deteriorates.
Amid the bustle of the market, the artist reminds us that, in the final
analysis, we cannot make assessments according to weight. The scales are
a just instrument in this endeavour, that permit this valuation even
when the eyes are blinded. Ulrike Kessl’s installation playfully weighs
up that which is hidden to imperfect insight behind a deceptive surface:
the value of the commodity art.
Anja Wiese
1) scales;
2) Space prohibits any further examination of this point here;
3) French “Balancer”: to hold in balance, swing, contemplate/examine, and “Labalance”: the scale